Two abstract paintings

[LONDONER]

If you want my honest opinion, to me it's just a bunch of colors splattered on a canvas, sparsely following some kind of structure.

I'm not inside the artists head, so I don't know if they represent an emotion, a place in his memory.

I don't get from it any message. That careful study Londoner talks about, I don't see it.

That probably speaks more of me than it does of him in any case.

If you want me to be even more honest, there is something about the color choice, the structure that is a bit repulsive to me. Not nauseating or anything, but something I want to take my eyes away from.

Thanks [MENTION=23097]Insertnamehere[/MENTION]. We have to accept that people have different tatstes and that abstractionism is not to everyone's taste. I'm of the opinion that in many cases realism has no point since the age of photography with the exception perhaps of portraiture that can add another dimension that a camera can't caprure in spite of Photoshop. I can see that that statement might open a whole can of worms!