05-23-2009, 02:01 AM
What Peter Tatchell seems to be saying is hardly groundbreaking. The nature v nurture argument has long supported the notion of a complex interplay of influences. Similarly, the notion of a "gay gene" was discredited fairly quickly. I didn't realise there were still people who looked for causes in such simple terms.
His description of awareness of dormant or repressed sexual desires until into the thirties is something I do understand, though. In my case it felt that mother nature was not going to be ignored.
I wonder whether his utopian vision of a possible future could ever happen.
(link to article)
His description of awareness of dormant or repressed sexual desires until into the thirties is something I do understand, though. In my case it felt that mother nature was not going to be ignored.
I wonder whether his utopian vision of a possible future could ever happen.
(link to article)
![[-]](https://gayspeak.com/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)
