01-02-2012, 12:45 AM
Slightly mixed up I am afraid.
The hypothesis is that a woman might develop antibodies against 'maleness' in some form if she bears a son. If she bears another son these antibodies in some way interfere with the maleness of that son.
Trouble is no one knows exactly what the 'male molecules' might be that she develops antibodies against. Also if she did produce these antibodies why have they such a very subtle effect to influence sexual orientation but don't create intersex sons?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The hypothesis is that a woman might develop antibodies against 'maleness' in some form if she bears a son. If she bears another son these antibodies in some way interfere with the maleness of that son.
Trouble is no one knows exactly what the 'male molecules' might be that she develops antibodies against. Also if she did produce these antibodies why have they such a very subtle effect to influence sexual orientation but don't create intersex sons?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Fred
Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans.
Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans.
![[-]](https://gayspeak.com/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)
