12-08-2011, 12:29 AM
fredv3b Wrote:States don't eat. The fact that the state has enough resources to run a criminal justice system and punish criminals (however they choose to define them) does not mean that some (or many) of its inhabitants are not starving. Economic inequality is not peculiar to the Western world.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So, you do not support Cameron's decision to limit aid to countries based on their human rights records? While food aid is a condition of many aspects of foreign assistance, it is not all. I would be willing to bet that medicine and food are not going to be the portion of aid cut for human rights violations. It is probably a question the citizens of Britain should look into. What aspects of aid would be cut and how much?