01-28-2013, 06:48 AM
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/articl...d=10861867
The school that's described in the Article, Auckland Grammar is my school. I personally think the new headmaster oughtn't to be taking obviously controversial measures to solve problems. I don't mean to be judgemental, but he seems inexperienced: every morning, he says the school prayer wrong, and is as nervous speaking to us as a student would be. He really should know better than to do something like this, the media was obviously going to soak it up like a sponge.
Anyway, rant about new headmaster over, I probably shouldn't have talked about my school, ._. you know how much schools resemble totalitarian states xD.
What do you think of school zoning? Is it a good way of controlling admittance to secondary institutions? Is it unfair, even, since it ultimately is a way of separating people by socio-economic status? What alternatives would you suggest?
I think the best way to have a fair admittance process would be tests, although that has many many drawbacks: administration costs, the pressure put under children as young as 11, and the disadvantages of standardised testing (don't even get me started on that) especially for a subjectless test as would be required.
The school that's described in the Article, Auckland Grammar is my school. I personally think the new headmaster oughtn't to be taking obviously controversial measures to solve problems. I don't mean to be judgemental, but he seems inexperienced: every morning, he says the school prayer wrong, and is as nervous speaking to us as a student would be. He really should know better than to do something like this, the media was obviously going to soak it up like a sponge.
Anyway, rant about new headmaster over, I probably shouldn't have talked about my school, ._. you know how much schools resemble totalitarian states xD.
What do you think of school zoning? Is it a good way of controlling admittance to secondary institutions? Is it unfair, even, since it ultimately is a way of separating people by socio-economic status? What alternatives would you suggest?
I think the best way to have a fair admittance process would be tests, although that has many many drawbacks: administration costs, the pressure put under children as young as 11, and the disadvantages of standardised testing (don't even get me started on that) especially for a subjectless test as would be required.