I'd say that being the only cut guy I've come across and being from England, it has probably knocked my confidence a little in terms of bedroom matters (mine was for medical reasons).
As for preference it's not really a thing that crosses my mind, surely people don't date someone based on whether or not they have a little flap of skin, it just seems silly.
Morally though, I think it's a breach of that child's rights if performed for anything other than a medical reason. Let evolution take it's course, if we don't need it we will evolve into not having it, why play god? I thought we were all made in his image?
![[-]](https://gayspeak.com/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)
•
Ekwarph Wrote:@Geminize : Circumcision = barbarity?
Well, I never felt traumatized by the fact of being traumatized, it's a religious tradition and a way of transmitting that family "thing". Even if I'm not a believer, if one day I have children, I would like them to get circumcised because it's something which reminds them from where they come and I think it's important.
Saying you're mutilated because you're cut and didn't choose it is a bit abusive cause concretely it changes abolutly nothing, for me it's a whim.
You might as well cut off one or your kid's fingers, he'll get used to having only four. He won't miss it either. We learn to cope. It's still called mutilations. Check the definition.
The fact is your parents stole YOUR right to have your say in this mutilation, and although you believe it has not altered your life, you can't possibly know what it has altered. If you are so intent on your male child carrying on with the Jewish tradition, why don't you let HIM choose to have the operation done when he's old enough to know what it means and what he may be giving up? Since you don't even have a strong religious reason for doing this, let HIM decide.
•
I am botched circumcision so I appear to nut have been circumcised. upon erection it becomes noticeable that my fore skin is not right.
Annually 117 boys die a year from complications just in the united states. I don't think the practice is wise.
As far as I am concerned cut or uncut i don't have a preference, just hard.
•
Um Sis, I am really not trynna by like "where...where is it?", this ain't no hide and seek.
That Dick better be there and Queer. Cut please!
Not only that, but I really just like the idea that it's more clean looking and stream-lined...like a Torpedo or a Rocket ship and that hoe better make a clear landing on my moon, I ain't got time to be worrying about any protective layers, other than the most important one.
But I wouldn't discriminate against penis though... After all, a penis is a penis, but my preference would be a Hot Dog.
Cause I don't feel like having to peel a Banana :/
•
I am just not as concerned with whether you go hoods up or down. More concerned about the person is connected to. But I am more of a top i never thought about the issues with cleanliness. I wear protection.
•
Posts: 10,581
Threads: 20
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation:
0
I'm a : Single Gay Man
Starsign:  Virgo
Mood:
hank Wrote:I am just not as concerned with whether you go hoods up or down. More concerned about the person is connected to. But I am more of a top i never thought about the issues with cleanliness. I wear protection.
if the gift isn't wrapped, there's no point in receiving. 
•
hank Wrote:I am just not as concerned with whether you go hoods up or down. More concerned about the person is connected to. But I am more of a top i never thought about the issues with cleanliness. I wear protection.
Uh uh honey, be concerned with cleanliness...especially because you are a top!
The person can be all well and good and pissin rainbows and glitter, but if they don't keep their act together downstairs, ain't no way a hoe is playin dat!
To quote Ludicris "Keep da Penis Cleanest", no matter the position!
Infact, keep your entire situation clean, top to bottom, head to toe. No shortcuts or detours!
•
QueenOdi Wrote:Um Sis, I am really not trynna by like "where...where is it?", this ain't no hide and seek.
That Dick better be there and Queer. Cut please!
Not only that, but I really just like the idea that it's more clean looking and stream-lined...like a Torpedo or a Rocket ship and that hoe better make a clear landing on my moon, I ain't got time to be worrying about any protective layers, other than the most important one.
But I wouldn't discriminate against penis though... After all, a penis is a penis, but my preference would be a Hot Dog.
Cause I don't feel like having to peel a Banana :/
Hahaha where is it? Seriously I've not met a guy thats uncut (I've seen cut too) who I've needed to "look" for the rest of his penis, I had to laugh at this because it is a little rediculous.
Uncut does not equal unclean, cleanliness is down to the individual and not whether they've been circumsized or not. I'm uncut myself and don't really care about it, I've never had any problems with cleanliness (its not a difficult thing washing down there) and I've been tested too.
•
QueenOdi Wrote:Um Sis, I am really not trynna by like "where...where is it?", this ain't no hide and seek.
That Dick better be there and Queer. Cut please!
Not only that, but I really just like the idea that it's more clean looking and stream-lined...like a Torpedo or a Rocket ship and that hoe better make a clear landing on my moon, I ain't got time to be worrying about any protective layers, other than the most important one.
But I wouldn't discriminate against penis though... After all, a penis is a penis, but my preference would be a Hot Dog.
Cause I don't feel like having to peel a Banana :/
The real debate shouldn't be one of aesthetics. ie if you prefer the sight of a circumcised man, it's a question of what you've been used to seeing most of your life (adult, I presume, anyway). Therefore it should be an adult's decision to have the operation for whatever reason he chooses to have it done, be it aesthetic, a question of personal grooming or hygiene (note that a clean penis is not dirty whether circumcised or not, that's just bulls***), or maybe a medical reason. The only reason for having it cut is phimosis and complications in urinating or difficulties in obtaining a satisfying and non painful erection. Otherwise, it's completely unwarranted to main a child or a baby for any other reasons. If we can't do female genital mutilation, there's no reason to perform it on a male child either. Full stop.
•
princealbertofb Wrote:. If we can't do female genital mutilation, there's no reason to perform it on a male child either. Full stop.
while i don't agree with either , i would say there is a huge difference between male circumcision and female genital mutilation / female circumcision .
female genital mutilation is done when the girl reaches puberty , and the purpose of it is to stop her getting any feelings of sexual pleasure or desire . it's a brutal , awful practice that serves only to oppress and punish teenage girls in places where women are considered less than men , and sexual desire from women is an evil thing.
death due to FGM is extremely common .
while i disagree with circumcising infant boys , it is nowhere near the same as FGM. male circumcision has nothing to do with oppression or degradation. it's a traditional religious practice that needs to end , because people should have a choice about what happens to their own body.
so , i disagree with both . but they are nothing alike.
•
|
