50Plus Wrote:Do you think that the LGBT is more concerned with sustainable practices than our non-exclusive planetary cohabitants?
If you think facial scrubs, hair gel and all of those shoes every gay appears to have is sustainable, sure....:eek:
I was green before it was cool. I was doing organic before the government came up with legal definitions and pretty much ruined the definition of organic.
For the record, I have a pair of tennis shoes, a pair of Doc Martins (my funeral and wedding shoes - been seeing a lot of action this year with those) and my work boots.
I am not a typical gay male.
From what I have seen, there ain't that many real sustainable life LGBT out there. Sure lesbians tend to want to live in the rural area, raise chicken pigs and goats and stuff, which gay men tend to want to live at the heart of the city, buy out a whole neighborhood and remodel and raise the property values through the roof.... But are these actually sustainable ways of living?
Things to make you go hmmm.
I was a hippy when hippy was uncool - I was elf way hella before elves were cool too. :biggrin: I find I am a rarer breed - regardless of sexual orientation.
I think a fairer assessment is that sustainable living is outside of sexual preferences and that regardless of sexual preferences there is this limited number of folk who are one with the Earth and seek to live in harmony and peace with the ecology. The majority only play lip service to the idea.
I have actually been doing the gay online dating thing, and my hippy ways count against me. Gay men appear to generally loath mother nature and the wild wood.... More the wild wood for me.... :biggrin: