BNP Member Names revealed.

[sweetlad86]

BNP are a poiltial party at the end of the day, and they have the same rights as any one else!

[Woolfe]

You don't need to discriminate to be a member of the BNP, who gives a damn about their party they will never win.
name and shame the party leaders not the innocent people who like their policies.

The central core of their position is discriminatory, and I agree that people who joined for other reasons don't deserve to be publicly demonstrated, but in some situations there's a choice between all the details going public or none at-all, and I stand by my point that in my opinion, the benefits far outweigh the costs.

Don't be so sure they'll never win, incidentally, though not in the foreseeable future I shouldn't think. But never become too complacent about the far-right, they've been around the longest...

Ky xx

[sweetlad86]

I think you are being rude your self!

You just keep going on about the same sort of crap they come up with!

[Woolfe]

Why is it you think that, sweetlad?

[CardShark]

The central core of their position is discriminatory, and I agree that people who joined for other reasons don't deserve to be publicly demonstrated, but in some situations there's a choice between all the details going public or none at-all, and I stand by my point that in my opinion, the benefits far outweigh the costs.

Don't be so sure they'll never win, incidentally, though not in the foreseeable future I shouldn't think. But never become too complacent about the far-right, they've been around the longest...

Ky xx

I actually have to agree with that, to some degree.
The list does show activists, but the amount of activists is VERY low compared to the amount of people on the actual list!

[Woolfe]

Bear in mind that's the amount of denoted activists, not every activist will actually be noted as such, but yes, it is unfortunately likely that there will probably be less activists in real terms than non-activists.

[sweetlad86]

Why because you are attacking my intelligence!

Every time I say some thing on this debate you seen to just make out every thing I say is wrong!

Its starting to get very boring!

I would just back off!

[Woolfe]

If that works for you, feel free.

Frankly, I don't agree with your points of view, so I'm disputing them. This may come as a surprise, but the point of a debate isn't necessarily to agree with you mostly and add a tiny little disagreement.

If I don't think you're right, I'll tell you that. If I think you're right, I'll back you up on it. I'm not here to piss you off for the sake of it, but I'm not here to massage your ego either. Don't get involved in a debate if you're not willing to be disagreed with.

I'm not attacking your intelligence, quite the opposite, I said that using an expression like "Whatever" as an answer to a point made -undermined- your intelligence, insofar as it made you appear stupid when that's clearly not the case.

[IanG]

I wouldn't be at all surprised if the release of BNP members personal details had been covertly sanctioned by their top brass. After all, how could the mainstream parties accuse them of being extremist bully boys when it were their (the BNP's) members being attacked or victimised simply for belonging to a legitimate political organisation.

It is important to remember what a thoroughly repellent organisation the BNP is, and it is equally important not to play into their hands and allow them to appear to be in any way hard done by.

[Woolfe]

Oh, I wouldn't assume the top brass would sanction something like that. Deniability is, after-all, the name of the game.

Ky x