[COLOR="Purple"]Thanks for bring this to "LIGHT"
Dan.
Did a little research on this and the WWF
Earth Hour is behind it (one of my best friends works for them so very cool). You can sign up at the site as well as send your reps (at least in the usa) request that the gov follow and take note of the issues.
While in San Francisco I followed the eco movement pretty closely as that city seems to be pretty active. It always seemed to us "real" activist that these yearly events were nice and all... brought some attention to the issue but that was that... Totally agree with cards. It will take even more to make this fucked up world of consumerism/pop change the way it really needs to change. Unfortunately we are on a carbon system and it runs very deep.[/COLOR]
http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/12/...r-2009.php has some great first comments. [COLOR="Green"]"There are 8,760 hours in a year. Across the world, people turned off their lights for ONE of those 8,760 hours. In other words, 0.000114155251 of the time in a year. If that makes you feel good about yourself (if you participated), you are one seriously deluded individual. Other than being a symbolic representation of people changing their light bulbs and buying up hybrids (though even hybrids are selling lately), this means absolutely nothing in the grand scheme of things.
The only solution to the climate change problem is the eradication of society as we know it. Complete and utter change in every facet of life as we know it. Anyone who thinks otherwise is an ignorant optimist who refuses to see the truth.
The fact is, our lifestyle is in no way sustainable. We can not innovate our way out, reduce/reuse/recycle our way out, or buy our way out of this problem.
I am in no way against endeavors such as Earth Hour, but can't stand thinking about people getting off on thinking that their actions actually have any positive effect on the planet."[/COLOR]
[COLOR="purple"]I am pretty certain I have a extremely low carbon footprint. I try my best to find ways to make it even smaller. I appreciate the effort Dan but wonder who is really ready to make the changes necessary? I am still looking for the cavemate to share the rest of my life with
Found these stats interesting, since F1 was brought up somewhere...[/COLOR] [COLOR="green"]"Let’s compare an F1 car to a typical car in the UK which produces about 160 g/km, and over a year (10,000 miles) will produce about 2.56 tonnes of CO2.
According to Wikipedia a typical F1 burns 75 litres of fuel per 100km raced. Based on figures for petrol (which is a reasonable proxy of race fuel), 0.75 litres of fuel burnt per km equates to a CO2 output of 1737 g/km. And over a race season using approx 100,000 litres of the stuff, that’s 231 tonnes of CO2. Per car. And each team has 2. So for fuel alone, before the costs of flying to races, support vehicles and the number of cows required to furnish Max Mosley’s “special” wardrobe, that’s about 463 tonnes per team. I wonder if they carbon offset?
At least they’re becoming hybrids for the 2009 season…"[/COLOR]
[COLOR="purple"]The link about F1 hybrid is pretty cute:
The Official Formula 1 Website. From what I can understand the braking system will improve the carbon footprint. Isnt that cute?
What is really cool is that I usually nap the time that this event is taking place so every day I participate
[/COLOR]