I like being cut, I feel like i have more area for stimulation that just the tip of my head.
•
A few years ago I checked the sensitivity of six different men. Two were intact and four were circumcised. My findings were exactly the same as those of the Sorrells study. The glans (head) of the penis was not sensitive at all. The sensitive part of the penis is the inner foreskin, of which 2/3 is usually removed during a routine circumcision. During most circumcisions, the dorsal slit extends 2/3 the length of the glans. The actual circumferential cut is behind that. This clearly indicates that at least 2/3 of the erogenous tissue of the penis is removed. How this can benefit sexual sensation I do not know. This would be like me removing one of my eyes and expecting to see better. It isn't going to happen. The outer skin of the penis in not erogenous, but the inner mucosa is. I observed that on both intact penises that I studied, that when the foreskin was retracted that nearly the entire penis was sensitive and not just a small mucosal cuff beneath the glans. In 1928 the AMA "American Medical Association" issued a statement advocating the circumcision of boys because it left only a small mucosal cuff of erogenous tissue. Their theory was, if the penis isn't very sensitive then boys would be less likely to masturbate. They were wrong about masturbation, but they were correct concerning the reduction of sensitivity. People work with what they have, unfortunately, the medical profession shouldn't be removing healthy tissue from boys that are too young to consent. The issue here is not health related. The issue here is psychological in nature. Hurting people hurt other people. If you will notice, men and women that have been subjected to genital cutting almost always insist that their boys, or girls be subjected to genital cutting as well. This allows the affected parent to justify their own genital mutilation. Circumcision is also a huge fetish throughout the world and there is plenty of evidence to support my statement. All one has to do is visit a site like circlist and they will see what I mean. The other individual that insists on "MALE" circumcision is the controlling mother. This woman likely suffers from penis envy and she may think of herself as a "god fearing" woman. She will try to control every aspect of her son's life. She is actually a feminist, but she donsn't realize it.
Between the controlling mother, the weak father with a bruised ego, and doctors trying to supplement their incomes, genital cutting is a force to be reckoned with and one that will not die easily.
•
I am cut, it was common practice i suppose here in the US when I was born. I wish I hadn't been or that my parents would have helped the healing better because it healed up in a weird way that is uncleanly. So unless your parents are informed on what to do to allow it to heal correctly when you are a kid then it is really doing more harm than good aka skin bridges and other crap. I am actually really self-conscious about how it looks as my boyfriend said it looked odd when we first met...
•
I don't want to go into a long post but just say very briefly, I'm not saying how bad it is for a child mentally, just to comment about the doctors and parents who think cutting is the best choice.
Instead of cutting it why don't you teach your son how to take care of the penis and ho to keep it clean? We are millions of uncut people in Europe and we are all fine and not infected because of having foreskin so I hope that's something American parents will start thinking about.
I'm glad to know the number of circumcision had decreased recently.
•
There was a recent proposal in San Francisco to make it against the law to circumcise a child...I dont' remember what happened to the proposal but for some reason it was taken off the table....
...I dont' really have an opinion on the matter myself. I can see both sides of the issue.
•
Here in America when my sister had her baby not that long ago, the doctors gave her the option to cut him. So it didnt seem mandatory.
•