08-10-2012, 04:59 AM
princealbertofb Wrote:Conversely, this is the WHOLE point of "marriage equality", of things being EQUAL. A right that every adult human being has to be entitled to (and have the duties of) a union which benefits the pair in many many legal ways.
Is there still an UNDERAGE limit???
From what I can see the whole argument is over the definition of marriage. In the past or present day law it is loosely defined. I don't think gender is even stated. Marriage was a spiritual between two people who love and want to spend their lives together. Now, the "religious ones" want to change and clarify stating marriage is a union between a man and a woman. I don't that ruling has a majority vote if that vote was taken to the people.
In my opinion there will never be an agreement on the moral issue., But in the name of liberty and freedom and tolerance they must grant equal rights to this marriage issue here. Deal nwith it and move on.I mean there are other thing that needs attending to. Like all those people that don't have jobs or enough money to take care of their families . Or how about this one stopping all the killing of our young people in the military. Or balancing a budget. I better stop now.