12-22-2010, 12:12 PM
as far as constitutional law vs military i understand there's a misunderstanding but while "in the military" you live in a dictatorship the constitutional rewrite that is lawrence vs texas is a law that must be followed, because it is part of the constitution now if it was broken by the military (without DADT) the military could justly face a lawsuit every time it persecuted a gay under ucmj.
As much as the military wishes it was above the law, it isn't, and it must still abide to constitutional rights.
As much as the military wishes it was above the law, it isn't, and it must still abide to constitutional rights.
![[-]](https://gayspeak.com/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)
