01-26-2012, 08:22 PM
Dan savage has a valid point regaurding long distant relationships. He says that there has to be and end in site for the distance. As long as you know after so long (say a month) that you will be together it is more likely the relationship will last. But if there is no end in site to the distance then it puts a strain on the relationship.
Imagine 4000 years ago there was no way to have a long distance relationship. There is a natural selection in mating rituals in nature. Naturally we are not meant to have long distance relationships but to have a companion that is there with us.
Look up the video on you tube video of Dan savage on long distance relationships. I can't post it fox I'm kn my phone atm. Gl
Imagine 4000 years ago there was no way to have a long distance relationship. There is a natural selection in mating rituals in nature. Naturally we are not meant to have long distance relationships but to have a companion that is there with us.
Look up the video on you tube video of Dan savage on long distance relationships. I can't post it fox I'm kn my phone atm. Gl