07-06-2012, 01:52 AM
Bowyn Aerrow Wrote:Top/Bottom, Sub/Dom, etc are attempts to come up with non-gender specific terms to describe the roles of individuals in a same gender relationship based on the general ideas of the leadership/follower relationship design that has evolved over millions of years with a species that only has two genders.
This (and the rest of the post) was very interesting! And I'm glad you could verbalize it because the top/bottom thing for gay men is clearer for me now.
In my experience as a lesbian it's pretty much used just as a strictly sexual term and while there are masculine lesbians who like to "be the man" (while others are more maternally dominant, or at least prone to hen peck) I've found it even more common (in the cases of who's in charge rather than the usual partnership) for the top to be submissive (if she exclusively tops then her partner is probably what we call a pillow princess or pillow queen who is spoiled sexually, including in being topped, and often in other ways as well, though there are pillow queens who will spoil her partner in other ways just to be topped in bed). The whole "who's the boss" thing seems less prevalent (or perhaps it's more accurate to say it's a lot more complicated and appearances can be deceiving...). It exists among some but for others it can actually be a secret shame to want to be the unquestioned alpha or nurturer (some lesbians really look down on "S&M dykes" and any suspected of being such for a variety of reasons, from philosophical to your garden variety of snobbery), and many see those who want a clear gender role as selfish, immature, and/or warped.
Just to be clear I don't really care. Whatever works for people is fine by me (that's not to say I'm compatible with everyone, just that I don't really judge others very often for their preferences). And just about everyone can be of use to someone, and I recognize that even in those few I DO tend to frown upon.