Which is worse?

[Corsac]

I wouldn't do either of those 3 yet I don't really care if others choose to do that themselves. Lots of people see either of those 3 as being morally wrong but if those 2 people consent to doing them then what is the issue? Other people are irrelevant unless one or both of you are in a relationship with other parties.

[TomStatic]

Do as you wish why should it bother you if it is not hurting ya fuckk ittt

[MisterTinkles]

I don't wanna start a thread riot or anything, I'm just looking for some opinions...

The main things that concern me are this:

1. Friends with benefits
   
2. Sex on the first date
   
3. F*ck buddies
   

I would say that Friends with benefits is the better out of the three.
For me, I would prefer that to the others, simply because I have to know someone for some length of time before having sex.

I had a friend with benefits before, and we had a lot of fun running around town, doing stuff, seeinig movies, riding bikes...and if we were both in the mood, then we would get down on it.

It is especially nice that we were such good friends, if he was interested in someone else, he would tell me ahead of time if anything was going to happen between them. Cause Im a clean freak and told him one of my stipulations was that if he had sex with anybody else, that he make sure they are clean (diseases and cleanliness).

Other than that, it was nice. No headgames, because no serious relationship was expected. No lies, because we werent obligated to do or say anything to each other. And nobody got mad if the other one wasnt in the mood. Sometimes we just sat on the couch, wathing tv, holding hands.

Hmmm.....I kind of miss that, now that Im thinking about it.

[Undreamt]

It depends on the person so my answer is

4. Someone who negatively judges people for enjoying any of the above.

I'd say sex on the first date is the riskiest,