Posts: 9,300
Threads: 3,497
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
0
I'm a : Single Gay Man
Starsign: Sagittarius
Mood: None
Bowyn Aerrow, you have elaborated on my message number 17. Without wishing to upset anyone, I would suggest that if you were born in the 80s and later, you shouldn't try to comment on what life was like for gays before then. As Bowyn Aerrow has pointed out, things have changed a lot since then and we live in entirely different times.
In the 70s I was living in Spain still under the rule of Franco when homosexuality was illegal under the law of "Peligrosidad Social", (Social Danger) punishable with prison where the most unspeakable and barbaric crimes were committed againts gays. So unspseakable and so barbaric that I'm not going to elaborate. You can think of almost anything and it was probably committed.
So, before anyone writes about what is depicted as being unreal, think a little and don't write about what you don't know. "Brokeback Mountain" was a very good film that depicted accurately the attitudes of the times.
•
Brokeback Mountain isn't entirely a gay story either. Annie Proulx said that the sexuality of the main characters is ambiguous, they could be gay or bisexual or something else, we don't really get any confirmation from it. I think the movie is OK for what it is, which is not a story about being gay but about a particular experience of two sexually repressed individuals.
I can't think of many particularly great representations of gay life by straight writers off the top of my head. Sherwood Anderson's "Hands" I think is one of the most puissant early representations of a kind of homophobic panic (mixed in with a panic about pedophilia). Willa Cather's "Paul's Case" is arguably about a gay boy, though Cather was also probably a lesbian. One reason I think it is so hard to think about good depictions of gay people written by straight people is because so few straight people choose to write about gays in any particular detail, at least until recently. All I could come up with were 2 stories written 100 years ago.
•
Why should it matter if the storyteller is straight? Love is not an exclusive concept.
I'm anxious to see a gay version of Taken, though. I think it could be awesome.
•
I didn't like Brokeback Mountain because 1) it bored me silly, and 2) it kept feeling like the producers wanted to show America: "hey, gay people can be rough and manely too! Stopping stereotyping them as all fem!" which is kind of an ironic statement in of itself. Suffice to say the movie itself reinforced other stereotypes, as others have highlighted.
But now that I think about it, I'm not big on most gay films/tv produced by actual LGBT people, either. I don't know....they all seem to romanticize different keystone experiences of being gay (the coming out process, learning how to socialize within the community, overcoming internalized homophobia, etc). I always yearn for something that's striking and true in gay story telling that's not currently being told. I'm all for supporting indie LGBT artists yearning to tell their sides of the story.
•
i trust people who haven't been into space to be able to write good science fiction stories .
i trust people who haven't time-travelled or who weren't born in a different century to be able to write good historical fiction .
i trust people who have had perfectly happy lives to be able to write good drama ~
it's not impossible to do research and get it right .
•