Bowyn Aerrow Wrote:IDK - can we trust a people who are lead by a woman? A Queen for Gods Sake - the Age of kingdoms is long gone, its the 21st Century and these Brits still have a Throne and a Queen they bow down to.
Surely there is nothing good in that!
:biggrin:
Proud supporter of the Canadian Royal Family of the majestic Maple Throne! Go Monarchist League of Canada! :p
![[-]](https://gayspeak.com/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)
•
Lol
MY MESSAGE ISN'T TOO SHORT, LEAVE ME ALONE 32WERPFOJD
Edit: Also, apparently it's impossible to make an all caps post. Well. I never knew that.
•
Thanks all
There is only one qween I bow to, and that's the one who show's me a "gear-leaver"
Since Aunty Elizabeth aint got one of those, I'm afraid she wont get my bow...:biggrin:
•
•
Pft - queens - I only bow to men - as sexist as that may sound, reality is I only get on me knees for men.... if Britain/England/UK had a King that would be more up my alley in the way of kink...
•
Does a King consort will do?
If there's a Queen there's a King consort no?
or maybe the King of the Netherlands/Holland/Dutchland?
oh, no...you already nuked the country... 
•
southbiochem Wrote:Isn't South Africa still part of the British Commonwealth?
If so, you people "recognize" Aunty Lizzy as your Head of State too..
:eek:
Now, BOW, INFIDEL, BOW, I SAY AND WORSHIP THE QUEEN LIKE YOUR GODDESS...
or I'll have your head chopped off and presented to her
(she still has that kind of power no?) ................................................................................................................................................
Well, let's put it this way......
Not according to the "broederbond"
Not according to the communist party,
Not according to "Die Oranjelanders"
Not according to the crime party the ANC
Not according to the Africkaaners, The Kaapenaars, the coloureds, the Indians, the Brakpanners, The Gautengers,The Pretoriaaners, Die Wes kaapeners, The Bloemfontieners, The Zulus, the Xhosas, the Shangaans, The Vendas, The Pedies, The Tswanas, oh and awhole bunch of others including the xsoisan, and the bushman Oh of course and not according to me....:biggrin:
Perhaps according to 2 families living in Nottingham road in the Natal midlands...:eek:
•
Bowyn Aerrow Wrote:IDK - can we trust a people who are lead by a woman? A Queen for Gods Sake - the Age of kingdoms is long gone, its the 21st Century and these Brits still have a Throne and a Queen they bow down to.
Surely there is nothing good in that!
:biggrin:
And yet we haven't had a Sovereign who has been put on trial since Charles I (Stewart) in 1649.
Remind me again, when was the last time the USA impeached one of their presidents? Yes, I seem to recall it was Bill Clinton in 1998.
Her Majesty is above party politics and is highly respected in the UK and the Commonwealth of nations of which she is head of state.
•
trialbyerror Wrote:Well, let's put it this way......
Not according to the "broederbond"
Not according to the communist party,
Not according to "Die Oranjelanders"
Not according to the crime party the ANC
Not according to the Africkaaners, The Kaapenaars, the coloureds, the Indians, the Brakpanners, The Gautengers,The Pretoriaaners, Die Wes kaapeners, The Bloemfontieners, The Zulus, the Xhosas, the Shangaans, The Vendas, The Pedies, The Tswanas, oh and awhole bunch of others including the xsoisan, and the bushman Oh of course and not according to me....:biggrin:
Perhaps according to 2 families living in Nottingham road in the Natal midlands...:eek:
Well, that's all very nice but the publics opinion, as you may well know, hardly accounts for what a government does, and SA is still part of the Commonwealth.
That's actually good since I heard there were plans to emulate the EU making a Union for the British Commonwealth.....and of course having Auntie Lizzy doesn't not mean anything...it hardly means anything within the UK, let alone anywhere else..
have you heard if such plans are taking place, duckie? About the BC Union? Or is it just bluff?
•
"...having Auntie Lizzy doesn't not mean anything...it hardly means anything within the UK, let alone anywhere else.."
No, not much, except that the Prime Minister has an audience with the Queen every week in which issues within government are discussed. The Queen has three main rights. the right to be consulted, the right to advise and the right to warn. It would be a foolhardy Prime Minister who does not heed her advice!
Members of the Royal Family who wish to marry must first obtain the consent of the Sovereign and of course the Queen still has a direct role in legislation through the Privy Council. The Queen still has an important function in our modern democratic government.
•
|
