Quote:I'm generally pretty moderate.
I don't personally know you very well so I can't speak to whether or not you're generally moderate. However you have made a number of decidedly extremist statements in this thread alone. I'm reminding you to be a thinking person.
Now as to the thread itself, this is a complicated issue in the USA. It's not going away any time soon. There's a lot of reactionism and hysteria surrounding guns. There is a huge segment of the population that isn't even going to listen to any arguments that they feel infringe on gun rights. My personal opinion is that the founding fathers made a few mistakes and this was one of them. I'm not blaming them. They were a bunch of rich white dudes who did the best they knew how. But they
weren't infallible.
The problem as I see it is that the amendment in question was too vague. It's normal interpretation is very, very black and white. If one takes the usual literal interpretation then the ultimate conclusion is that is would be perfectly all right for a private citizen to possess a nuclear bomb and drive a tank. We generally recognize that allowing things like that are not practical. For whatever reason we don't apply that logic to hand held firearms.
Interestingly enough, the word "guns" is
never mentioned. Go read it for yourself if you don't believe me. So why do we draw the distinction between guns and other armaments? It's completely arbitrary. Since it's obvious that having heavy artillery in the hands of private citizens is not in keeping with public order and safety, and nobody's crying about wanting their own privately held patriot missiles, why then do we have so many people fighting so hard to apply the principle to hand held firearms?
I'm personally in favor of allowing people to own guns
in general. However, to ignore the violence and death even as it's on the increase is not intelligent and in the long run might lead to the amendment in question being repealed
in it's entirety. While it's not something we haven't generally done, there is a mechanism in place for just that sort of thing. Refusing to talk about the issue creates just the sort of all or nothing mentality and division that could lead to catastrophe.
Extremist viewpoints always cause problems if allowed to take hold. I categorize the almost religious fervor that rural Americans place on gun issues as an extremist viewpoint. They are, on the whole, unwilling to discuss the matter. Period, end of story good day sir. That's not winning them any points with the moderates or liberals, and it's also not winning our country any points with the rest of the world.