Slightly more American term - homo.
Its a bit derogotory the same way pakistani’s will be called pakis, homosexual was shortened to homo, of course it depends who says it and with how much venom or anti-venom. I have more problem with the title straight cause it implys a kind of normalacy and uniformity that doesnt exist
•
Honestly?
I hate all of them. I use them for ease of identifying people, of which I use 'gay' most often.
But I prefer to be called by my name, or for people to say, "Oh, he's dating _____", rather than people saying, "Oh, he's gay.". No, I'm not gay. I have a name, thanks...
•
If asked I define myself as same sex
Back when I had just fostered my son, it became public knowledge and long story short I was invited to be interviewed on a particular reality TV show.
My legal advisor advised me to go, as declining would seem negative / ashamed / something to hide, but I was warned that it was most likeley going to be hostile, in which case fight fire with fire.
It was hostile, but to cut a long story short two descriptives came under the spotlight.
I was called gay, to which I responded I am not gay. Neither am I frivolous, or jolly, or silly-happy, which are other ways to describe gay.
I am a serious, and purposeful person. In reference to my sexual identity I am same sex orentated, please do not use the term gay.
The other descriptive was my "affair"....
I blew up! What gives you the right to refer to my life partner of 12 years as my affair?
Anyway, that's off topic here so I won't go on, but you get my drift
•
Why isn't Faggy McLikesdick on the list?
•