He can call himself whatever he wants, he seems pretty funny, but if he's 100% straight then I'm a pink elephant named Cher.
•
My brother in-law is a high functioning, super intelligent person with Aspergers.
I know how they think and I know what they are like.
But very much like ADD, I get the sense that this "aspergers" diagnosis is more often than not, a load of bull to explain away a quirky personality rather than something genuine.
My bro-in law is very straight and does not have the slightest interest in having sex with a guy.
But my bro-in law's personality is very much more masculine, down to earth, laid back etc than this guy's flamboyant, effeminate, shock jock personality. Not saying he's gay or bi, just not 100% straight.
I'm not gay, I don't have aspergers, but I am just as capable of messing around with a dude as he is and just as capable as compartmentalizing sex as he does.
I find the notion of gay for pay pure bs. especially when the lame explanation is given that "I just think of a really cute girl I know or imagine that it's a girl giving me head."
Pure crap...I can get hard without thinking of sex of any kind at all, penetration or oral on your dick feels good period. It's perfectly normal and natural to get hard and stay hard purely based on physical stimulation...no need to be even thinking about sex at all.
it's just the notion that anyone would do porn period solely for the money is utterly absurd, so for a straight guy to say he will do gay porn just for the money is being even more ridiculous and disingenuous.
Just be honest and admit you are not 100% straight, quit with the BS.
"Gay for pay" just a marketing tactic.
•