Posts: 4,635
Threads: 45
Joined: May 2014
Reputation:
0
I'm a : Single Gay Man
Starsign: Sagittarius
Mood:
I think we are in general agreement, Hardheaded1, but your first paragraph confuses me.
I am simply glad that a local news station which is fairly centrist and open has taken on the task of reporting the event and has also been contacted by the model who brings an enlightening stand to the conversation. I imagine that the PFOX organization simply used a stock picture without researching its background. Yes, it did blow up in their face and I consider that to be a good thing.
I bid NO Trump!
•
hahahahahahahahaha
As Meridian noted, what's worse, is the ridiculous premise that because you have a pair of twins that they are perfect genetic clones of each other and therefore, behaviourally utterly identical in every respect.
Anyone with identical twins will be able to tell you that there are differences in behaviour that exhibit themselves directly from the womb.
This should at least have all the parents of twins laughing at the group that pissed away their money on this stupid billboard.
•
I just noticed that I accidentally quoted your quote of ceez instead of ceez's quote. Thanks for the catch. I was scrolling down and overshot when I thought I was quoting him.
I meant to quote "ugh, this had to be in VA didn't it. now every religious bigot will drive by the sign and say "see, I told you".
And for the record, I don't have any beef with arguments that contend sexuality is more than mere genetics, but I am a strong opponent to the notion that homosexuality is inherently immoral. Whether it is styled as a choice, a developmental adaptation, a genetic imperative, a result of estrogen flooding the womb, or whatever, it matters not. It is a legitimate state of being, and therefore needs no defense from its causation. It is not a defect, period. It is statistically a fringe occurrence, but so is being a genius.
•
The reason they are so adamant about it being a choice is because if they accept that it isn't a choice then they look like the assholes that they are for directing so much hatred and discrimination against us...and ruining so many lives.... "in the name of Jesus" ...
If it is a choice...they can argue we made the wrong one and their job is to save us...a lot more convenient for them.
•
lets say that I'm a sociopath. i can't help but be a sociopath. its not my fault that i developed into a sociopath.
but to the religious nuts a sociopath is immoral. what if i don't act on being a sociopath but i'm still a sociopath.
am i still a bad person?
also can morals be taught to homosexuals? how do you define morals?
if you take away the fact that its wrong to be gay then can you make a homosexual be a good person.
morals are defined by a society.
a society that defines whats right from a book thats called the bible.
how do you set the standards of whats morals are to include homosexuals.
if you tell a child you are evil from the start whats going to happen?
the child is going to self destruct and could become evil just from being told you're evil.
all of these things come form what the majority of society sees as normal.
when the kids who think they are normal see someone who is not normal what do they do?
the mind is a hard drive thats programmed. I suggest we start thinking outside the program.
when i was intimate with my boyfriend it was heaven. nothing in the world was better then enjoying his company. it made the troubles of the world disappear for me.
how is this evil unless i had him tied up and he was saying ... HELP ... help please ... someone help!
•
one more thing
salvation is saving someone from sin.
jesus has no problem with gays he has a problem with sin.
I'm not here to convert you.
do as you wish.
•