Fromgenesis Wrote:That seems fine if you are the result of chance development (evolution) as your life will have no meaning - There is no reason for your existence. You may create your own goals to guide your life, but it has no intrinsic value.mile: If you are however the result of a Creator's actions, your meaning depend on Him. This idea is however repugnant nowadays as we want to be masters of our own universe, and not responsible to such higher authority to whom we are responsible.
It is a bit like you building a house and the house deciding what its purpose is.
How do you get from natural selection, which is not a completely random process (although the twists and turns of this evolution could often have produced different results), to an assertion that the life of an individual has no meaning? That is less an argument than a set of assumptions!
If there is a purpose to life it is to fulfil the drive to perpetuate itself. Ideas, even totally irrational ones, also exhibit this characteristic. The strongest survive the longest, but certainly do not pass down the ages unaltered.
The conscious mind is programmed to look for patterns. Recognition of patterns is a major part of the survival process for everything from the single-celled organism through to the entire cosmos. I suspect you would have a tough job on your hands trying to convince, for example, a new mother that her life has no meaning when she has her newborn child in her arms.
I don't follow the simplistic God/house analogy at all. Without the process of natural selection I would not be living in a house. I would be sheltering under a tree or hiding in a cave. Over time the most effective ideas for living in a safe and warm environment have survived resulting in the gradual understanding of building technology.
Sure, I build a house for a purpose. The dynamic of the house is to decay. If my drive to stay there is stronger, I fix things.