Rate Thread
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
So the Pope is not so liberal after all
#11
The point remains the same. Whether race, sexuality, veganism, or whatever else "evolved" standard one chooses to apply as the litmus test for this or that person, it isn't an absolute standard applied in a vacuum.

My point remains that one is not reduced merely to a label on one topic, whether it be bigot, misogynist, Republican, gun advocate, pedophile, materialist, hedonist, or whatever. The caption of the thread frames Pope Francis as being "not so liberal after all," as if liberal or conservative is some objective and fixed standard. It is relevant to context.

Is Francis liberal in Russia, Berkeley, Kansas, the Pentagon, Soho, Belfast, or Miami? It's a sliding scale. It's wrong to cherry pick a single items and use it as a litmus test. It is wrong to get all butt-hurt because JFK didn't move on civil rights fast enough, or because a great scientist or philanthropist was a homophobe, or because some millennial kid is a great artist but shit when it comes to environmental responsibility or philanthropy.

We live in an era in which we too easily confuse those who are not perfectly aligned with our ruler to be against us, or dubious, or worthy of scorn. It is clear from all accounts that Pope Francis is more a friend to gays and acceptance than any of his predecessors we can personally remember. To suddenly find it shocking that the Vatican cannot set aside its entire history of religious teaching should be a surprise to no one. It is naive to reduce his character to a monolithic rating of "good" or "bad" or "liberal" or "conservative" based on such a superficial evaluation. The papal throne is not in fact an absolute monarchy. There are forces and powers that suffuse the Church that encompasses more adherents than any other religion on this planet. Presuming to know the pope's strategy and ultimate intent is like presuming to know what the U.S. President actually knows about any international crisis: we don't know.

Feel free to be disappointed that Pope Francis isn't your Messiah, but take a moment to consider the realities of the Papacy and consider what the man is accomplishing by degree. He is a lot more than a "bigot" regardless of the bigotry with which you choose to fill your field of vision.

When we choose to attack our allies, we make a poor decision for our own cause. We are more selective in the derogation of our own ancestors, but thread obviously serves to give pretext for those who simply hate the institution and need little if any basis for their own anti-religious bigotry like Wade's. Championing the cause of the poor is indeed virtuous, and it is gratuitous to dismiss it while summarily framing those who do as sycophantic whores. It becomes more apparent the "meh" bubble that surrounds some lives.
Reply

#12
I don't like the Church. I think they have done more harm to the world than good. If someone is whacking me (me being the human race) with a big stick for 2000 years, and then one day their leader said "Hey, c'mon guys, that's enough! Come here poor creature, I'm not like the other mean ones," I would have a hard time trusting him.

I don't, however, look down on Catholics. I don't judge what people choose to believe. If you believe that makes me a bigot, then I'm not going to argue it further.
Reply



Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Pope apologises to gays LONDONER 3 822 06-27-2016, 05:35 PM
Last Post: bryyzy
  Pope Francis demotes outspoken American conservative Cardinal Burke Rareboy 1 656 11-13-2014, 12:55 PM
Last Post: Hardheaded1
  The Pope says that 2% of Catholic Clergy are paedophiles LONDONER 2 555 07-30-2014, 09:52 PM
Last Post: Aike
  Is immigration within the EU too liberal? LONDONER 23 1,404 12-02-2013, 02:17 PM
Last Post: mihai
  Pope suspends German Bishop of Bling LONDONER 7 959 10-24-2013, 05:52 PM
Last Post: LONDONER

Forum Jump:


Recently Browsing
1 Guest(s)

© 2002-2024 GaySpeak.com