RUoutthere Wrote:Very nice deep thinking MikeW.
It still begs the question, who (or what) created this complex universe you described?
Your detailed accounting crosses virtually every form of science and yet all well accredited scientists believe for anything to happen, there must be a cause for it to happen. Who or what is the cause?
Short answer, God. Of course that is a name us tiny little human beings in the universe came up with. For those who believe in the one Creator, His response to Moses when asked was "I am". Meaning He is everything. Of course he had to use the language and the words of the time that us humans came up with so we would understand. So in some sense of your explanation, we are a part of God.
I'm skeptical of your theologically heuristic epistemology. The problem with cause > effect thinking (or put in the reverse, if B exists then A must be its cause, or, if not A, then some other designation that preceded it IN TIME) is that this assumes a temporal realm within which a linear progression of events can occur.
What I'm suggesting is that the cosmos is multi-dimensional and that outside of the three dimensions of space and the one dimension of time (the 3-4D perception of reality we all seem to share) there can be higher dimensions... at the very least one more, a 5th dimension, that some have called "eternity".
Eternity need not mean an infinite duration of linear time. It could just as well mean infinite parallel realities or, perhaps better yet, a realm of infinite possibilities all happening "at once" (so to speak). In *that* realm everything "happens"; and there is neither cause nor effect; everything just IS.
Our experience of this "fifth dimension" is limited by our 3-4D perception that says ONLY SOME THINGS HAPPEN... and specifically only those things that we know of or have observed.
So, no, I don't agree that the cosmos must have a transcendent "cause" (much less a "creator God")... it could equally be its own cause and, as such, neutralize the theological dichotomy of immanence vs transcendence.
But, of course, when I say "cosmos" I'm thinking not of just the 3-4d universe of billions of galaxies (the furthest extent of which we've not even begun to glimpse). I'm thinking of a multi-dimensional (5D minimum) that can be said to BOTH exist and not exist; BOTH in time and not in time -- and that's because the fundamental reality is NON-material -- rather pure potential actualized by participation in it.
I believe physicist
David Bohm was speaking of this possibility when he coned the phrase "
The Implicate Order:"
Quote:In the enfolded [or implicate] order, space and time are no longer the dominant factors determining the relationships of dependence or independence of different elements. Rather, an entirely different sort of basic connection of elements is possible, from which our ordinary notions of space and time, along with those of separately existent material particles, are abstracted as forms derived from the deeper order. These ordinary notions in fact appear in what is called the "explicate" or "unfolded" order, which is a special and distinguished form contained within the general totality of all the implicate orders (Bohm 1980, p. xv).
And physicist,
John Wheeler said it outright when he mused:
Quote:May the universe in some strange sense be 'brought into being' by the participation of those who participate? (J.A. Wheeler, K.S. Throned C. Misner, 1973.)
I've been preaching an existential gospel for decades now that insists: ONCE SOMETHING RISES TO THE LEVEL OF PERCEIVED EXPERIENCE, IT CAN NOT
NOT EXIST. To us, as entities in a 3-4D time space, for sure, this referred to experience may be "in the past"; perhaps even forgotten. But in the context of a 5D Cosmos, it NEVER ceases to BE (any more than it ever was NOT to begin with).
This is why I say we don't understand WHERE WE ARE (much less who, what, and when). Where we are -- seriously, where we are every moment of our lives -- is on the bleeding edge of eternity.
We just don't SEE it that way (at least not often).
.