01-31-2009, 07:50 PM
I buy GT most months. The revamp a while ago promised more than it has delivered, but it is what it is (cue Jerry Herman?).
I used to buy it from WH Smiths, but these days I prefer to patronise a smaller independent newsagent who stocks a few copies each month. Unfortunately, it is always kept on the top shelf, and you know what that means :eek: Today I went in to buy a copy and was surprised not to see it in its usual place. I found it eventually, but it was totally obscured, behind a mag called "Cumming Out" and I had to sort through a stack of porn to find it.
I've no objection to the naked male physique (or, come to that, searching through stacks of gay porn either ), but I prefer not to be made to do it in public. Gay lifestyle magazines are not pornographic publications. I pointed out to the shop assistant that I was uncomfortable with having to hunt through the porn to find GT. I indicated the stack of lad's mags on the second shelf with far more provocative covers (consisting of photographs of barely-covered women trying to stand up despite the gravitational inclination of their unfeasably large breasts) and she agreed with me. She said she'd speak to the manager about finding a more appropriate spot for such titles as GT, Axm reFresh, and so on. We'll see.
I had this discussion in Smiths a few years ago and for a while they kept the gay mags almost at floor level (one extreme to the other). They are back on the top shelf these days, but at least there they don't have to share with the soft porn.
Straight men don't have to search among the Hustlers, Playboys and Asian Babes to find FHM or even Nuts. I don't see why we should have to do the magazine reader's equivalent of running the gauntlet. To be honest, I suspect it is largely ignorance on the part of the shopkeeper who may never have looked inside a gay lifestyle mag.
Please join my campaign to get the gay magazines displayed at or below eye-level, although I suspect it will need a catchier campaign title than that
As a post-script I'm wondering if the manager deliberately put this month's GT behind the rows of naked twinks. The cover does break with recent convention.
How much more Lily Allen do we need?
I used to buy it from WH Smiths, but these days I prefer to patronise a smaller independent newsagent who stocks a few copies each month. Unfortunately, it is always kept on the top shelf, and you know what that means :eek: Today I went in to buy a copy and was surprised not to see it in its usual place. I found it eventually, but it was totally obscured, behind a mag called "Cumming Out" and I had to sort through a stack of porn to find it.
I've no objection to the naked male physique (or, come to that, searching through stacks of gay porn either ), but I prefer not to be made to do it in public. Gay lifestyle magazines are not pornographic publications. I pointed out to the shop assistant that I was uncomfortable with having to hunt through the porn to find GT. I indicated the stack of lad's mags on the second shelf with far more provocative covers (consisting of photographs of barely-covered women trying to stand up despite the gravitational inclination of their unfeasably large breasts) and she agreed with me. She said she'd speak to the manager about finding a more appropriate spot for such titles as GT, Axm reFresh, and so on. We'll see.
I had this discussion in Smiths a few years ago and for a while they kept the gay mags almost at floor level (one extreme to the other). They are back on the top shelf these days, but at least there they don't have to share with the soft porn.
Straight men don't have to search among the Hustlers, Playboys and Asian Babes to find FHM or even Nuts. I don't see why we should have to do the magazine reader's equivalent of running the gauntlet. To be honest, I suspect it is largely ignorance on the part of the shopkeeper who may never have looked inside a gay lifestyle mag.
Please join my campaign to get the gay magazines displayed at or below eye-level, although I suspect it will need a catchier campaign title than that
As a post-script I'm wondering if the manager deliberately put this month's GT behind the rows of naked twinks. The cover does break with recent convention.
How much more Lily Allen do we need?