Canada is our closest hope even though it is not legal in the U.S. ( yet)
•
Posts: 2,418
Threads: 41
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
0
Mood: None
fjp999 Wrote:Goodness, I thought ya all over there in Europe had taken care of this already
marshlander Wrote:Tell that to the Poles So much for the European Union making rules that the member states have to stick to in order to join the club. I'll leave it to Fred to explain the veto!
Am I now the de facto GS politico?
The EU does make rules that the member states have to stick to. However marriage is not one of them. There are certain broad areas where member states have agreed that the EU should make the rules, and in general they have given up their national vetos on such matters in favour of qualified majority voting (i.e. instead of agreement having to be unanimous, directives are passed if they have at least [I think] about 75% of votes [the number of votes held by a nation depends on its population]). However outside these broad areas the EU can only enforce rules with everyones agreement i.e. national veto. Marriage (and other 'social' issues) has always been considered to be outside the remit of the EU.
Quite frankly, there are many people, particularly in England who want no part of a 'European Super-State'. If Europe were to state who can and can't get married, what rights and responsibilities marriage entailed, etc. then I for one would be up in arms about it, even if what they were proposing I agreed with entirely e.g. gay marriage.
Fred
Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans.
•
Posts: 2,418
Threads: 41
Joined: Oct 2008
Reputation:
0
Mood: None
fjp999 Wrote:Of course was just a joke since over here the conservatives are always going on how lawless the Europeans are and how gay marriage has destroyed the family and church
Oddly we Europeans consider the US to be lawless due to your lack of hand gun control, murder rate, etc.
fjp999 Wrote: wanna explain why going up in arms and all fred? will we get to see you bashing in some starbucks windows
Why, because a 'European Super State' would, effectively, be a conquering of my own country, albeit bloodless. Starbucks is entirely safe from me, it has done nothing to support a 'European Super State'.
Fred
Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans.
•
I happen to agree with Fred on the national autonomy issue. However, I recognise my own ambivalance when it comes to the sort of human rights and fairness issues that our national government can be rather slow at picking up. Sometimes external pressure is really useful. However, I get the impression that most European law seems to stem from unaccountable sources and that is unacceptable ... mostly. :frown:
•