I think age is a
very relevant consideration in a relationship, but perhaps not for the most obvious reasons.
I don't think age should be a precursor to
preventing a relationship - not by any means, nor do I harbour ANY negativity towards people in non-matching age relationships (my first boyfriend was ... ooh ... about 17 years my senior !!) - all I mean is that there are a number of things that must
be considered when large gaps in the age of the parties to a relationship are a factor.
Things like, if this is going to be a long-term relationship, at which age will the parties retire ? You might think it's nice to be with somebody that's perhaps more established (by which I mean professionally successful; mid-career perhaps, etc., etc.), but when that person is going to retire 10-15 years, say,
before you then (unless they're FABULOUSLY wealthy and can afford to enable you to retire alongside them), it's going to SUCK @SS when you're working and they're lying in bed going "Mmmmmmmmm wish you could stay here with me", non ??
There are other things as well, of course ... like the health of the parties, even the life-expectancy of the parties (which sounds really REALLY nasty of me, but I have to be pragmatic since the question
was asked) ...
... but that's about it as far as I can tell ... NONE of the above should be viewed as a bar to entering into what could be a good thing
mile: - I just feel that it does raise a number of considerations which
both parties to the relationship should be aware of.
mile:
!?!?! Shadow !?!?!