Rate Thread
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
HIV Infection Reported in Patient Who Was Taking PrEP?
#1
[SIZE="3"]This is a warning. If you're taking PrEP, practise safe sex!

https://uk.yahoo.com/news/hiv-infection-...26767.html[/SIZE]
"You can be young without money but you can't be old without money"
Maggie the Cat from "Cat on a Hot Tin Roof." by Tennessee Williams
Reply

#2
Not surprised. PrEP significantly reduces the risk but isn't 100% safe.
Reply

#3
Piri Wrote:Not surprised. PrEP significantly reduces the risk but isn't 100% safe.

Indeed. I'm amazed people do not know that. PrEP is not universal, first of all, and secondly - It's not 100% working.
Reply

#4
Sadly I am not surprised either. There is nothing to protect you 100%, even if you always wear a condom. Those can end up with a hole in them, which wold allow for transmission, even with a lower chance it still can happen
Reply

#5
Thanks for the reminder...One has to be very responsible in his every act
Reply

#6
Piri Wrote:Not surprised. PrEP significantly reduces the risk but isn't 100% safe.

I thought that was common knowledge too!
Apparently not, so thanks for sharing and spreading the info [MENTION=18457]LONDONER[/MENTION]

Infected dude in treatment with an undetectable level mixing blood and cum with a healthy guy on PrEP still doesn't mean safe sex. PrEP should be used WITH condoms.
Reply

#7
I feel like this should be common sense.
If PreEP were 100% effective in everyone then it'd be the first 'perfect' medicine in history.
Reply

#8
“All of these studies are showing it’s 97 percent effective -- not 100 percent,” notes Dr. Rodriguez. “So this wasn’t a surprise.”
Dr. Stork observes that one of the concerns when PrEP was introduced was that patients would no longer practice safe sex. And this does seem to be happening – rates for most STDs have gone up.
-
From the article.

Sad
Reply

#9
It is my understanding that PrEP does not have a 100% efficacy rate, so it would be expected that there may be some cases in which a partner may be infected. I wonder though, did the HIV+ person know his own diagnosis and, if so, was he undetectable? U=U
Reply

#10
The matter that there are sexually active people that do not know this clearly without any confusion is a testament to our need for better, recurrent PSA throughout our communities.
Heart  Life's too short to miss an opportunity to show your love and affection!  Heart
[-] The following 1 member Likes ChadCoxRox's post:
  • NutsForBalls
Reply



Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Your experiences with prep Scruff Bunch 1 356 04-01-2024, 06:06 PM
Last Post: jacques_roland
  Rare monkeypox-related illness that causes brain inflammation reported in Colorado CellarDweller 0 925 09-17-2022, 06:25 PM
Last Post: CellarDweller
  Anal prep / bowel movements Vaeraneth 3 1,564 03-12-2022, 08:33 PM
Last Post: calgor
  Going on PrEP tgerm 7 1,107 07-10-2017, 02:26 AM
Last Post: tgerm
  Unprotected sex that could lead to HIV infection verysimple 13 1,235 02-14-2017, 11:16 PM
Last Post: princealbertofb

Forum Jump:


Recently Browsing
4 Guest(s)

© 2002-2024 GaySpeak.com