Login

10-09-2010, 10:25 PM

Genersis Wrote:Alot of them were in their underwear, but none of them were.........in the nude were they?:confused:

Bah, what do i care...............:redface:

Yup, a couple were... well one when I'm in NJ (he had a nasty wang) and then one in NY (wang was just as bad, maybe worse).

juk Wrote:I feel cheated - I missed out on this :mad:

Trust me, you didn't miss anything. They were just boring generic-looking guys. I think I only came across one decent looking guy and then one guy looked like my ex-best friend (no, not my ex... a dude I knew in person).

10-09-2010, 11:10 PM

Cutieboy Wrote:Yup, a couple were... well one when I'm in NJ (he had a nasty wang)

Nasty wang - that made me lol

10-09-2010, 11:16 PM

Cutieboy Wrote:Yup, a couple were... well one when I'm in NJ (he had a nasty wang) and then one in NY (wang was just as bad, maybe worse).

A nasty wang? You sure you're gay? Wavey

10-10-2010, 05:17 AM

Some of those guys were kinda hot and some were just nasty with their penis pics and the like.
I'm glad it's gone too, I only NOW realized though, that I could have just blocked the site's ad.

10-10-2010, 05:44 AM

I personally don't like profile on dating site with only naked body or piece of meat between the 2 legs.
Sad

I prefer a face with big smile and a description which shows a little bit of the soul rather than the size of their dik

10-10-2010, 06:20 AM

marshlander Wrote:A nasty wang? You sure you're gay?

Yeah, I'm pretty selective when it comes to wangs. That one wang... ugh, yeah it just wasn't doing anything for me at all.