pellaz Wrote:i am not so sure what you saw in my picture but i contemplated taking some screen shots of the third video you posted.
think things through how you want it to be (at least for a few days) before typing. And then do a flip and post something different. Someone might not care what they read. I liked your vide(s) and its a lot of work to get the stuff up here posted. Maybe i should post less on this thread and let it fade.
You know all of this is not necessarily work safe but it is nothing we don't own ourselves or what we see at the gym. Its a same sex situation.
Thanks for your post, Pellaz... I agree with you. It may have sounded as if I was criticizing but I wasn't really. I was just questioning whether showing genitalia was allowed, be it in a state of repose.
I don't personally mind human nudity and these pictures certainly aren't pornographic. I was just not sure that pictures showing the genitals were allowed on this site, which is not mine, so it's really Andy who can decide. I don't think it's unfriendly to show men's flaccid genitals online, to be honest, as this is part of nature anyway (you might contend that erect genitals are also natural, of course)... I didn't want to pick a bone with you. I think making the human form visible is desirable because it's beautiful.
I believe the idea is to keep it fairly 'clean' on here and 'ok' for children to find
randomly. Admittedly, if they are too young to see a grown adult in Adam's costume, then they shouldn't be surfing the web without parental guidance.
I also agree that my videos show a bit of the crotch area sometimes... (maybe they shouldn't?) but you have to click on the links to access them, which is slightly different to having it posted in the middle of a thread and directly visible. I hope this won't be considered as double standards.
Anyway, we've had no reaction from Andy, and I'm sure he's watching the site. No one has complained. I think it's safe enough for now.
Take care.