09-30-2014, 07:13 AM
I STRONGLY suggest anyone who's outraged by this article practice a bit of skepticism and ask "who benefits?" You can go around the internet and catch other WWF stories about doomsday for wildlife and there's *almost never* any citations of scientific studies.
Here's criticism of WWF off Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_...#Criticism
And here's SHOCKING reports of the salaries paid to WWF officers in nations that require records be made public. http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2012/03/2...arth-hour/
So... ask yourself, "who benefits?" before letting your outrage take over.
Here's criticism of WWF off Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_...#Criticism
And here's SHOCKING reports of the salaries paid to WWF officers in nations that require records be made public. http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2012/03/2...arth-hour/
So... ask yourself, "who benefits?" before letting your outrage take over.