Glad you guys got your boners back or whatever. I got one more point to make and then I'm backing off.
Quote: Gurl please, you wasted all of your time and energy for that? Use all your psychoanalysis on someone who gives a fuck, cause clearly I think everyone is too preoccupied with not giving one to you and you just tried to take it from them, so normally I would be sweet and kind, but gurl you brought it on yourself.
You're absolutely right! Thank you for reading what I wrote. Fucking finally! No need to be sweet and kind, I know I asked for this hostility when I called them on their shit for trying to be cool... which C'MON, BE HONEST YOU GUYS, YOU THINK YOU'RE PRETTY FUCKING COOL.
Yeah I don't know why I'm wasting my time trying to convince a bunch of people with their heads up their asses that maybe they should try something else... it's ended up being more of a let down than anything. I guess it was to be expected...
Anyway. I did want to say a bit more stuff. Just to bring this shit to a close.
First off, How can you NOT be judgmental on the internet!?? The internet is a completely sterile environment: no body language, no face reading, etc. Unless you develop an online relationship with someone, there is no other way to interpret something somebody says than plainly how it exists in writing/images. If I take something to "another context", it's because I'm viewing it completely out of context. And I'm saying that if I interpret it like that, chances are somebody else will too.
It's difficult to imagine other human beings (behind the user-name) responding to what you write, because the nature of the internet is dehumanizing. But yep, I'm sitting at my computer, and you're sitting at yours, and he at his, and her at hers, and we're all reading posts and having reactions that are completely our own, and sometimes people get offended, and sometimes people get scared, and sometimes people get influenced, and most of the time it wasn't intended, but that's what happens...
So... I was just trying to get you guys to realize that you're on a public internet forum. If you cared and understood what that means, you'd be more receptive to the way an "outsider" responds to something you write. The fact that you all immediately jumped down my throat because I insulted some of "your own", without considering that maybe something you did may have done damage to someone else, well, that's some sort of elitist clique mentality, and eeehhh... it kind of sucks to everybody who isn't involved.
It sounds like you guys didn't see any harm in what you were doing, and that's totally forgivable. Maybe now you'll think about it a little more. Maybe you won't. Fuck it.
A couple points in response to Vilekyle,
Interpreting "art" is not anybody's "fault", it's just what happens to everybody when they look at something. The artist is responsible for putting "art" into the world, and also responsible for what comes out of that, to an extent... You can't just throw a brick through a window and not take the blame for when the window breaks. Now, if the window breaks and then the building collapses, well, who saw that coming, right??
Of course there are many other elements that come in to play when someone decides to go on a killing spree.., such as access to guns, home life, mental illness, etc. But I don't think you're giving enough credit to images and their influence.
In response to your "visual stimuli never makes someone pull a trigger...":
Why do you think advertising is so effective? Because images influence people to buy things. Images influence people to do a lot of things, and it's not just "visual stimuli" that is being sold, it's the fantasy of living that image.
...I really do appreciate the "righteous thorn" comment. I'd rather be a "righteous thorn" than an "ignorant dick-head". Good luck with that.