07-28-2008, 04:20 PM
marshlander Wrote:
- we probably agree on many points
Agreed
marshlander Wrote:I disagree that most people get their impressions of gays from pride events
- most people have never seen a pride event
- people like John Barrowman currently have a much higher visibility than any pride
- not everyone reads the papers
How do you know that most people have never seen a gay pride event before? Are you taking into account viewings from second hand sources such as videos and magazines aswell? Not everyone reads the newspapers but almost everyone has access to some form of media wether it be newspaper, television or internet, i'm certain that you can find representations of gay pride in all of these.
I'm not really sure of any mathematical equation that measures visibility, so I don't think it's possible to say wether John Barrowman has a greater degree of it than pride does. All I know is that gay pride is specifically designed to be the event that communicates our culture to the outside world.
marshlander Wrote:
- perhaps we should encourage local pride events to ensure that events contain a rally that celebrates and commemorates the reasons we are there as well as expressing our hopes for our own and the future of our brothers and sisters around the world. Otherwise what's the difference between a pride event and a night out clubbing?
- do pride events have themes?
- drunk people, gay or straight, are generally not my company of choice
To a certain extent I agree with you, however I belive that having a more conservative rally within a gay pride event will do nothing to diminish the negative image of pride as a whole. You mentioned that last year in London pride you marched under the Stonewall banner, on a google image search I typed in the phrase "London gay pride 2007", this is what came up:
http://images.google.co.uk/images?gbv=2&...pride+2007
As you can see no images of the Stonewall banner have come up, on the other hand a number of promiscuous ones have. Quite disturbingly the very first image, as posted by the BBC (a website known for its legitimacy) shows a picture of numerous half naked males in fetish uniform.
marshlander Wrote:
- marching under the Stonewall banner in last year's London pride was an enriching and moving experience. As far as I can remember everyone in that group dressed normally. Applause and genuine appreciation from the crowds lining the streets followed the Stonewall group all the way along the route
I'm glad to here it and i'm sure that the crowd genuienly appreciated your efforts. Unfortunatly the Stonewall banner is not the one thats going to get the majority of publicity.
marshlander Wrote:
- the carnival arts are a recognised and valid form of expression
- the arts should be prepared to challenge and mock the existing order
- I agree there is a fine line dividing the challenging from the offensive
Do we as the gay community actually want the carnival arts to represent us? who gets to choose what happens at a gay pride festival? Is there a democratic election or does the same group do it year after year?
marshlander Wrote:
- if we forget what we are celebrating are we doomed to repeat our past?
I do not advocate the removal of banners such as stonewall from gay pride, quite the opposite. Themes such as this need to make up the backbone of the festivals as opposed to the usual drag queens and nudity.
marshlander Wrote:
- we'll not change some people's opinions, whatever we do, but we might make a difference to some if we stand up and are prepared to be counted
Agreed, I just don't think that gay pride (its current incarnation atleast) is the best way to be counted.