lynx Wrote:And one more think I've got writing the post: maybe is this just a way out from the game for people who have no sufficient courage or strength...
I am not sure I agree with that. From what I here about ex-gay programs they are very demanding and require a great deal of strength.
Those that grow up both gay and strongly 'traditional Christian' must surely find themselves in a very difficult situation. Their deeply held religious beliefs are in absolute contradiction to their own feelings. There are only three possible solutions to this either their beliefs are wrong and must be changed, their feelings are wrong and must be changed or that although feelings, in themselves, are neither wrong nor right for them to act on their feelings would be wrong and they must live a life of celibacy.
Considering these possibilities in turn. First, actively trying to change your beliefs to ones that are more convenient to your current situation, is on the face of it, the worst kind of 'right or wrong is decided by whatever makes you personally happy' / do whatever you want code of ethics. So I can understand why to such persons it does not sound an attractive option. In any case nobody ever believes their current thoughts and beliefs to be wrong.
Considering the last option next. Celibacy obviously has significant draw backs, but I can see the attraction (sort of) of devoting your life to Christ. I suspect that many young Catholic gay men consider entering the priesthood, if you are going to to have to be celibate anyway why not join a group where you are expected to be celibate and have support and comradeship.
I cannot quote the exact scripture but St Paul said something to the effect of its best to be celibate, but for those who cannot manage that there is marriage. This is a teaching that seems to be quietly forgotten by many American Evangelicals who seem consider traditional family life to be the highest form of Christian life. Many of the Ex-gay ministries seem to be Evangelical in nature, which brings me to the second option. If you believe that being gay is wrong and that getting married to someone (of the opposite sex) and having children is something that you should do (not merely could do) then the possibility of becoming heterosexual is very attractive. If you have real faith in the power of Christ and someone in your Church promises you that through prayer you will be 'healed' then the possibility could well seem realistic (and remember these will be people desperate for a solution). I don't think that this could be regarded as the easiest option, just the one whose promised ultimate outcome is most attractive.
sox-and-the-city Wrote:Until she can formulate a coherent sentence i don't think anyone whose mind would have been changed is gonna listen, tbh. This kind of media is not aimed at anyone who is gonna be reasonable enough to challenge it.
Sox I agree that she would not for a minute persuade an impartial listener. However I think her message is aimed at those who are already looking for a 'cure' for their homosexuality, they already 'want to believe'. Hence the reason she gets so emotional (or the producer chose someone who would), they wish to avoid such difficult questions as to how they are cured or why God made them that way in the first place, they want to capitalise on vulnerable viewers hope and need for 'change'.
Ultimatley, I don't think that gay atheists (or am I agnostic) such as myself are going to persuade such people who might enter such programs not to. Their faith is very strongly held, and whilst on the one hand it is part of their problem (as I see it) it is what has helped them to cope with life so far. I think that it is fellow Christians who take an enlightened view of Christianity who may be able to show them that it is possible to be both gay and Christian and not self-distruct.