02-06-2017, 03:14 PM
Hmmm, if the case is such that data has to be manipulated in order to make it, then there's not much of a case is there...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...-data.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/a...-data.html
Quote:The report claimed that the âpauseâ or âslowdownâ in global warming in the period since 1998 â revealed by UN scientists in 2013 â never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the worldâs media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.
But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, âunverifiedâ data.
It was never subjected to NOAAâs rigorous internal evaluation process â which Dr Bates devised.
His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a âblatant attempt to intensify the impactâ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.