Shouten Wrote:I didn't say americans are demonic, though. But the actions of your elected officials are. And it's not just now! How many wars have been started by the US just for the past 50 years?! How many more did they participate in? Do you know where's the US? Does it border Syria?
There are no evidence, that Assad is the one who used chemical attack. If anything, the whole chemical attack incident and the following reactions would help ISIS and the Rebels. I guess you might symphatize the Rebels, but ISIS wins just as much from a weakened Assad.
I find this whole thing disgusting and what troubles me even more is that this time, much to my dislike, I'll have to agree with Russia - US actions are beyound wrong and terrible.
I'm not about to defend the motives behind a lot of US intervention in the past century, I'm absolutely not going to suggest Trump has any strategy or idea about what he's doing. Or that he is not going to get us in there and make the whole situation 100% more fucked. And I'm not going to try to simplify this to good rebels vs bad government - especially after the UN has declared all sides guilty of war crimes after what happened in Aleppo.
I've never been to Syria, I'm not well informed on its current situation or its history, and I don't have a political science background or anything like that. But I have been following what's been going down since the Arab Spring. The UN seemed pretty sure that Assad has used chemical weapons on his people before, though they do deny that too. But I personally don't know for sure either way or have any authority on my own to claim to.
But as a human being, one who feels for others strongly, can say with certainty, the civilians of Syria have been used as pawns by all sides and are in the middle of a worsening humanitarian crisis. Call me naive, but I am not yet so cynical as to believe that the US, or other international powers have absolutely no place in intervening in such cases. Gathering international support and all that first would be much better than acting impulsively seemingly after watching a tv show report on the dead children of Syria, yes. But is it better not to act at all?
This is a shit situation no matter how you look at it, but are we going to keep drawing red lines and then doing nothing as they are crossed and making empty threats? Should we actually try to be an isolationist country and just withdrawal all aid and personally, military or otherwise, close all our embassy's and just wall ourselves off? What responsibility, as a powerful, wealthy country so we have to en it comes to stepping in?
I guess what I'm hung up on is that these are actual humans, this is an ongoing humanitarian crisis with global repercussions. There are people there who need help. So much tells me not to trust the is's motives, to view Syria through the lenses of the other grand fuck ups of the past, to demonized Trump for an uncalculated and rash move. But there's this part of me that is like, all that aside, something has to be done though, right?
I do t know guys, I'm really disturbed by all this. Especially now that we are pointing fingers to Russia and the Russians are sending ships towards ours (or at least last I read).
Long story short, I don't think it's evil of us to be getting involved and it's too late to think about what the most appropriate way to get involved could have been. But at least right now in this moment, from my safe, stable bubble, part of me is glad we are finally stepping in. But maybe I'll be eating those words soon.
And at the very least, if WW3 is about to start, at least it wasn't launched by some fucking tweet though. That's how I figured it'd all go down. At least this is somewhat of a worthy cause.