01-12-2012, 10:24 PM
I don't believe in God.
However, earlier today I stopped to speak with some people on campus handing out Bibles. And they were annotated! Being the lit nerd that I am, I never pass off the opportunity to get a well research edited text with useful secondary material. But when I started to read it, well I don't think I've ever been more disappointed in my life. The guy handing it to me asks me to turn to John 6:18, the walking on water episode. So, I go ahead and read the verse and its corresponding note. It was like the Bible was annotated by a high school English teacher.
John 6: 18 appears as thus in the KJV:
And the sea arose by reason of a great wind that blew.
The Bible they were handing out rendered it as thus:
And the sea was turning beneath them from the wind.
And then the note read, "the turning of the sea represents the turmoil of people's lives." Completely useless, and the guy has the gall of saying that it's to make the Bible come alive for readers of today. So, basically they dumbed down the Bible, and then filled it with trite pointless readings of the verses.
Now, I guess a passage across a rough sea can be read as an allegory of the human condition. But, this verse by verse notation attempts to suggest the Bible is imminently profound in every line. The old high school method of creating any possible meaning out of any combination of words. First of all, symbolism when the Bible was written was intensely different from what we think of as symbolism, and this implies a highly anachronistic reading of the text. If someone said, "this passage makes me think of the journey through life as the people move across the water to Christ." That would be a reasonable personal response to the verse, but to suggest that its meaning is some boring book club platitude is just poor editing.
I told the guy that I felt the note was trite, and that the point of the passage was simply to mythologize Christ. Or in Christian friendly terms, the gospel of John is attempting to emphasize the divinity of Christ through the telling of his miracles.
I realize that I'm incredibly anal and that the fact that I'm bothered by bad Bible commentary is probably an indication of my impending mental breakdown. It saddens me how the people who most venerate the meaning of the Bible have such a lazy attitude towards one of the seminal text of Western literature .
However, earlier today I stopped to speak with some people on campus handing out Bibles. And they were annotated! Being the lit nerd that I am, I never pass off the opportunity to get a well research edited text with useful secondary material. But when I started to read it, well I don't think I've ever been more disappointed in my life. The guy handing it to me asks me to turn to John 6:18, the walking on water episode. So, I go ahead and read the verse and its corresponding note. It was like the Bible was annotated by a high school English teacher.
John 6: 18 appears as thus in the KJV:
And the sea arose by reason of a great wind that blew.
The Bible they were handing out rendered it as thus:
And the sea was turning beneath them from the wind.
And then the note read, "the turning of the sea represents the turmoil of people's lives." Completely useless, and the guy has the gall of saying that it's to make the Bible come alive for readers of today. So, basically they dumbed down the Bible, and then filled it with trite pointless readings of the verses.
Now, I guess a passage across a rough sea can be read as an allegory of the human condition. But, this verse by verse notation attempts to suggest the Bible is imminently profound in every line. The old high school method of creating any possible meaning out of any combination of words. First of all, symbolism when the Bible was written was intensely different from what we think of as symbolism, and this implies a highly anachronistic reading of the text. If someone said, "this passage makes me think of the journey through life as the people move across the water to Christ." That would be a reasonable personal response to the verse, but to suggest that its meaning is some boring book club platitude is just poor editing.
I told the guy that I felt the note was trite, and that the point of the passage was simply to mythologize Christ. Or in Christian friendly terms, the gospel of John is attempting to emphasize the divinity of Christ through the telling of his miracles.
I realize that I'm incredibly anal and that the fact that I'm bothered by bad Bible commentary is probably an indication of my impending mental breakdown. It saddens me how the people who most venerate the meaning of the Bible have such a lazy attitude towards one of the seminal text of Western literature .