Is this sexy?

[princealbertofb]

I find that it is...

[princealbertofb]

Fantastic artwork.

[MikeW]

Nice photograph, attractive young man -- but I wouldn't call it "sexy".

ETA, I'm referring to the first pic. The second one is a bit more sexy to me than the first.

[princealbertofb]

And this?

[princealbertofb]

Or this?

[princealbertofb]

Mike, thanks for your answer, but I am saying "sexy", not erotic... which, I guess, to me are two different words.
Are sexy and erotic the same to you, Mike?

[LJay]

Or this?

I am not a tattoo fan, but this would be a very interesting concept for one.

[LONDONER]

Sorry, I don't find either of them sexy nor erotic. Both adjectives come from something "inside" and in those photos where you can see the eyes, they're empty.

[princealbertofb]

Thanks, LJay and Londoner for your answers. It's not very easy to pin point what makes you want to watch a picture more closely, when there is so much going that could be eye attracting.

[Hardheaded1]

I like the first, but it isn't a turn-on. I love beautiful hair, serious expressions, and flowers. This combines them well enough. I'm not a fan of attaching metal things to soft body parts, but that's his choice.

The tat pic isn't sexy to me, but I like his turban and would love to meet him just to meet him.

The tighty-whitey is erotic, as I love hair and dicks, if not stretched necklines.

The spilled rainbow milkshake is a cool image for a poster, but I wouldn't want to mix it up with that in real life -- messy just isn't sexy to me. Beautifully photographed though.