|
I thought we had a thread about this case, but I can't find it, so forgive me for starting it up again.
In 2008 Martyn Hall and his civil partner Steven Preddy were denied a double room at a privately owned guest house in Cornwall. Judge Andrew Rutherford ruled that the owners were breaking the law by doing so.
I realise that for many on here, state "interference" in the beliefs of individuals is going to cause a problem. However, I thought the judge's summing up made some interesting points:
Quote:"We live today in a parliamentary democracy. Our laws are made by the Queen in Parliament. It is inevitable that such laws will from time to time cut across deeply held beliefs of individuals and sections of society for they reflect the social attitudes and morals prevailing at the time that they are made.
"In the last 50 years there have been many such instances - the abolition of capital punishment; the abolition of corporal punishment in schools; the decriminalisation of homosexuality and of suicide; and on a more mundane level the ban on hunting and on smoking in public places.
"All of these - and they are only examples - have offended sections of the population and in some cases cut across traditional religious beliefs. These laws have come into being because of changes in social attitudes.
"The standards and principles governing our behaviour which were unquestioningly accepted in one generation may not be so accepted in the next. I am quite satisfied as to the genuineness of the defendants' beliefs and it is, I have no doubt, one which others also hold.
"It is a very clear example of how social attitudes have changed over the years for it is not so very long ago that these beliefs of the defendants would have been those accepted as normal by society at large. Now it is the other way around."
So while PA and I may still face the prospect of leering kids on the reception desk making smutty innuendos at least we can sleep easily in our double bed knowing that we have a legal right to be there!
|