hank Wrote:I agree, it wasn't supposed to be this same old argument that never goes anywhere. I just wanted to talk to some people about bisexuality perhaps some others share my frustration. I will miss defiant. I hope he returns.
I don't care fir the labels myself.
It's inevitable a discussion will lead to an Arguement, this much is plainly evident, but it's the manipulation of discussion and how well you can work it, otherwise it's just petty, meaningless bickering. Similar to Intelligence, you can have all of it you want, but if you cannot apply and wield it adeptly, then it becomes naught but things you know, but can never manifest or articulate.
To Talk about Bisexuality,Sexuality, or any other sensitive and/or controversial topic will garner an Arguement, as it attracts very different opinions, but how such opinions are stated and percieved will result in the outcome of the Arguement, in this case ; Repetitive.
As are many Discussions here, because not only does history tend to repeat itself, but because Repetition is the minds way of ingraining information or to relive, even vicariously so, a memory or experience for whatever reason, in this case; comraderie or understanding and perhaps a lack thereof.
I also believe labels are both important and detrimental, yin and yang, because without labels, identification of both self and others becomes difficult, if not impossible and as most animal species, we require identification for our socio-idiosyncratic lifestyle, as social creatures. But with labels, we tend to either get the short stick or the long stick, again like animals, example, Alpha and Omega (and Beta) and run with it.
So being called a Fem does not bother me, because it's what characteristically I'd be identified as, but stigmatic applications to this, is something as an Empath and deeply cognitive individual, do not agree with.
Similar if not the same as you wanting to be seen as a Bisexual, for characteristically, you harbour an affinity for both males and females, however to be reduced to being restricted to one or the other through stigmatic opinions, offends you, i.e- being with a guy makes you gay for that period, or you aren't truely bisexual if you are monogamous, because monogamy requires attraction to one person(and consequently one gender) at a time, which is what Daddy was trying to touch on.
However, it is logical to say Bisexuality cannot occur where Monogamy does, as in essence, dual attraction defeats the meaning of Monogamy, but an important factor to note, is that monogamy does not rule out sexual orientation, so you may be with a male and know you still like women, but until you act on that, you are monogamously Bisexual, but to be Bisexually Monogamous is a contradiction in terms, which is what Daddy I think tried to articulate.
Again, I really am Neutral, because to me, everything and everyone is equal, so do what you need to and be who you know you are.
<3
Got it gurlies? Dropped both my titties on your skullz! <3
![[-]](https://gayspeak.com/images/duende_v3_local/collapse.png)
